WordPress/PHP coding standards enforcement.
// AUTOMATED TOOLS
Automated checks are necessary. They are not sufficient.
These tools together catch roughly 30% of the real problems in AI-generated code. Add them all. Then get a human to check the rest.
PHP static analysis for type safety.
Dependency CVE scanning.
Supply chain security for npm/composer.
Broad multi-language static analysis.
Automated code review with GitHub PR comments.
Low false-positive code quality.
Design anti-pattern scanner for AI-generated frontends.
Runtime error monitoring and performance tracking.
Copy/paste detector for source code. Finds duplicated blocks across your codebase.
Finds unused dependencies, exports, and files in JS/TS projects.
Codebase intelligence for TypeScript and JavaScript. Static analysis plus optional runtime tracking.
CSS analytics that gives you an aerial view of your entire stylesheet.
A grumpy senior code reviewer for Claude Code and Codex. Gives a one-word verdict (catastrophe/bad/mediocre/ok), lists concrete file:line gripes, and never suggests fixes or softens the review.
WHAT NONE OF THEM CATCH
No automated tool catches design-level security decisions. Rate limiting defaulting to off. Unauthenticated encryption. SSRF through an admin-configured URL. These require a human who understands the domain.
Find a human reviewer →RECOMMENDED STACKS
WORDPRESS PLUGIN:
PHPCS + PHPStan + Snyk + Socket + SonarCloud or Codacy
NODE.JS:
ESLint + Snyk + Socket + SonarCloud or DeepSource
NEXT.JS:
ESLint (built-in) + TypeScript strict + Snyk + Socket + SonarCloud or DeepSource
ASTRO:
ESLint + Snyk + Socket + DeepSource or SonarCloud
ALL PROJECTS (BASELINE):
At minimum, one dependency scanner and one static analyzer